山西医科大学:发挥医学专业特长助力抗疫******
山西医科大学1815名师生主动请缨投身校外疫情防控——
发挥医学专业特长助力抗疫
■从严从实从细抓好疫情防控
“20天里,在老师的指导下,我和同学们操作复杂的检验仪器,累计完成35万份样本检测。”被派驻到位于太原市尖草坪区的气膜方舱实验室营地的志愿者、山西医科大学2022级公共卫生专业硕士研究生王元昊说。
12月4日,山西医科大学支援太原气膜方舱实验室营地的43名青年志愿者载誉而归。他们是山西医科大学最后一批返校的青年志愿者,也是山西医科大学众多师生在新冠肺炎疫情形势严峻的紧要关头发挥自身专业特长,积极投身校外疫情防控工作的缩影。
弘扬志愿精神 以行动践行担当
“姐姐,这是送给你的,谢谢你们!”当支援忻州市忻府区抗疫的山医志愿者们接过当地小朋友们亲手制作的写满感谢和祝福的卡片时,惊喜与感动如潮水般涌上心头。一幅幅锦旗、一封封感谢信、一个个关爱的眼神、一句句深情的话语……无不表达着群众对师生志愿者工作的肯定和赞许。
志在心中,愿在行动。在社会面临复杂严峻的新冠肺炎疫情防控形势时,面对地方政府和疾控部门向学校发出支援的请求,山西医科大学广大师生主动担当、积极作为,下沉防疫一线,支援各地市疫情防控工作。他们奔赴太原市、晋中市榆次区、忻州市、临汾市等地,走入社区、医院等开展志愿服务,积极投入样本检测、数据录入、环境消杀、电话流调、移动方舱实验室建设等工作,在疫情防控一线用实际行动践行着山医人的初心使命。
山西医科大学公共卫生学院2021级研究生李梦玲第一时间参与临汾市疫情防控电话流调工作,询问涉疫人员的活动轨迹,运用自身专业知识判断涉疫人员行程轨迹的合理性,利用公安部门的技术手段查明轨迹中不明确的涉疫人员、场所等信息,力求精准溯源。
“这个世上没有超级英雄,不过是无数普通人都在发一分光,然后萤火汇成星河。万众一心,与爱同行,抗疫必胜。”这是山西医科大学2021级公共卫生专业硕士研究生聂艳聪支援忻州疫情防控后的体会,也是诸多山医志愿者师生的共同心声。
发挥“智囊”作用 助力联防联控
跟踪山西疫情发展态势,开展流行态势预测,完成多期省内外多地新冠肺炎疫情分析报告……在这场没有硝烟的战斗中,山西医科大学发挥高校“智囊”作用,利用大数据研判分析,助力疫情防控,为动态调整防控策略、跟进实施防控措施、及时补短板强弱项等建言献策。
山西医科大学与山西省疾病预防控制中心共同签署了“应对新冠肺炎等重大传染病疫情和突发公共卫生事件技术支撑合作框架协议”,全面提升山西省疾控机构防控能力和科研水平。学校教授解军、王彤等人带领的科研团队承担了国家重点研发计划课题、山西省卫健委课题、山西省新冠专项课题等,在免疫接种、病毒感染潜伏期、病毒灭活疫苗接种方案等方面,充分利用科学技术助力疫情防控。
受国家联防联控机制综合组委托,山西医科大学公共卫生学院多位专家带领学生对广西北海、海南三亚和四川成都疫情防控提供技术支持,为当地精准科学防控提供依据,得到国家联防联控机制综合组的高度肯定,也为把学校早日建成全国一流研究应用型医科大学奠定了坚实基础。
线上线下齐发力 创新科普助防疫
除了活跃在抗疫一线的志愿者服务团队和潜心钻研战疫情的科研团队,山西医科大学的师生们主动作为,线上线下齐发力,在心理疏导、行为指导、防疫知识传播等方面都效果显著。
为有效应对疫情防控校园封控期间师生可能产生的心理压力、不良情绪及突发心理状况,山西医科大学整合心理学、精神卫生学、临床医学学科优势,构建起全周期覆盖、全平台支持、全天候陪伴、全方位育人的心理防疫矩阵,依托附属医院精神卫生专家,融合线上线下、整合各方力量,推出了面向全省高校师生的“医心医疫”心理支持云平台。学校依托“山医心理”微信公众号推出“深夜树洞”窗口,及时为处于心理困扰的学生排忧解难,举办了“战胜考试焦虑手册”主题线上心理健康主题讲座,并通过拍摄一系列微视频,宣传心理放松技巧,守护学生心理健康。
疫情发生以来,山西医科大学采取线上线下相结合的形式,举办培训会、动员会,制作精品共享课程,帮助广大民众认识疫情、了解疫情,做好疫情防护。学校开展疫情防控科普微视频拍摄、制作、宣传活动,在各媒体平台播出系列科普宣传微视频42个,用通俗易懂的形式向广大公众普及疫情防控科学知识,用实际行动助力筑牢社会“抗疫”防线。
今年10月以来,山西医科大学先后有1815名师生主动请缨加入疫情防控志愿者队伍,发挥医学专业特长,为国家作贡献,为社会负责任,他们用实际行动彰显了新时代山医人的使命与担当。近日,山西医科大学向广大返乡学子再次发出了倡议书,号召大家返乡后严格遵守属地防控规定,做好寒假期间的个人防护,在保障自身安全的前提下,主动担负起医学生的时代使命,做有理想、敢担当、能吃苦、肯奋斗的新时代好青年。(通讯员 侯小宝 皇甫亮 本报记者 高耀彬)
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
![](http://i2.chinanews.com.cn/simg/cmshd/2023/01/19/a09e3ea3e4bd4b23af8f21f9065fe2cf.jpg)
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
![](http://i2.chinanews.com.cn/simg/cmshd/2023/01/19/743a5a95b4194fd4a7b9fefcc318f3c7.jpg)
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
![](http://i2.chinanews.com.cn/simg/cmshd/2023/01/19/0dada14aa3944747b0a5eb8662fdbb00.jpg)
富翁彩票地图 |